Spacecraft

One might think that the ultimate survival tool is that of a spaceship. If a massive asteroid hurtling towards Earth was inevitable, causing an extinction-level event, with no technology or capability of taking it out before impact, a spaceship would clearly be beneficial in escaping Earth to live in space or to seek out a new home planet or moon. I think the highest levels of the U.S. government already have the technology to take out such a cosmic threat, it’s just not publicly disclosed as that would release top-secret information to the public and the people would demand even more information that is currently classified. But even so, there are still many threats facing humankind, and having a vehicle that lets you freely move about your environment is ideal. There is safety in numbers and going out alone or with a small group of people in space is far from ideal. Space, the universe, is the great unknown and feels like the Wild West. You may have avoided a planetary catastrophe only to soon find yourself in a new life-ending disaster in the cosmos.

The very notion of building a spacecraft may sound ridiculous to many, and that is understandable, I will explain more about why I believe this to not be so unattainable. I will talk about the main three aspects of achieving this goal, the cost, the technology, and the greatest obstacle of all, the U.S. government.

I remember the second time I spoke with the late Stanton T. Friedman on the phone. Stanton was a nuclear physicist, a professional ufologist, and the original civilian investigator of the Roswell UFO incident. An incredibly kind and welcoming man who made his personal phone number available right on his website. Both times I called him, he picked right up and welcomed any questions I had. The second time I called him I specifically wanted to know how feasible he thought it would be to build a spacecraft that resembled the UAP technology that is regularly witnessed by people. He believed human beings could engineer such a spacecraft at what was the present time back then, approximately ten years ago. When I asked how much he thought it would cost, he used his own personal experience working on classified projects to make an estimate, thinking primarily about the labor involved; he came to the amount of over one billion dollars. So as far as being able to afford to build a spaceship, there are close to 3000 civilians at the time of writing this book who are billionaires.

The matter of discovering and building the necessary technology for a spacecraft will certainly be more challenging than raising the necessary funding for such an endeavor. Bob Lazar claimed to have worked at Groom Lake (Area 51) in the 1980s on extraterrestrial spacecraft technology. While his department was heavily compartmentalized, he knew that they were trying to understand how a particular part of a spaceship worked. From his talks about his experience, it was evident that the government had multiple spacecraft in its possession and was able to fly and test some of these aircraft. So, while the team he was working with seemed perplexed and challenged by a particular technology, it was evident that teams of scientists at Groom Lake had a great understanding of how some of these spacecraft functioned.

Maybe the most promising example of human beings creating or discovering spacecraft technology is that of the work of Dr. Salvatore Pais. Formerly an aerospace engineer with Naval Air Systems Command/Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Dr. Pais is currently working for the Navy’s Strategic Systems Programs. He recently got widespread attention after the publication of multiple patents that have been related to compact fusion reactor energy. The patents have been referred to by many as “UFO patents,” as each one has applications for spacecraft technology.

In the documentary, A Field Full Of Secrets two individuals set out to build a spacecraft with the help of an inventor. The motivation had been largely a hypothesis that certain crop circles were in fact blueprints for building spaceship technology. Without spoiling this fascinating underrated film, it’s evident that even a team consisting of a few people on a relatively small budget can make some progress in this area.

I believe that human beings are capable of understanding how to build a spaceship without help from reverse engineering extraterrestrial spacecraft or “cheating” so to speak. But certainly, having such a resource would expedite the learning process. Of course, that is not something that would be accessible to any civilian under normal circumstances; however, with remote viewing, a person might not have access to the physical spacecraft, but they may be able to retrieve the necessary information to solve and or understand any perplexing engineering problems or other challenges for the development of such technology. According to Stephen McMoneagle, a world-renowned remote viewer, UFO’s don’t make the best targets because it’s nearly impossible to verify the results. However, it does seem that if you took a well-known UFO case, such as the Phoenix Lights mass sighting, the Barney and Betty Hill incident, or even one of the specific nights Bob Lazar went to view testing of spaceship technology at Groom Lake with friends, that with enough remote viewers, you would be able to get enough useful information that could lead to further development of the collective knowledge needed to build and operate a spacecraft. I think historically what the problem has been, is that it has taken an extraordinary amount of resources and discipline to produce even fifty well-trained remote viewers. It is evident that taking this crowd-sourced approach is not currently practical, but I think it has potential and is also worth exploring further.

The greatest obstacle in creating a spaceship is that the United States government at the highest levels actively suppresses such developments by civilians within regions it controls. If you were to get close to finishing the construction of a spacecraft, which of course would be challenging to do, especially doing so under the radar to not bring attention to your activity is incredibly unlikely. Those responsible for suppressing this technology would confiscate and or destroy the spacecraft, but in some cases do more than that to the makers. The consequences could go to a dark place beyond character assassination or financial ruin, like actual assassination, imprisonment in a military facility, or torture.

A spaceship is a technology that is a legitimate national security concern. Imagine if North Korea had a spaceship to go along with its nuclear weapons. Having a spaceship that serves as a drone or is occupied by a person or a small crew, either way, acting as a delivery system for a nuclear warhead. This could be releasing a nuclear bomb or a suicide bombing (if occupied) for the sake of being faster. It’s hard to believe there would be any kind of deterrent for the speed of such a spaceship weapon, as in something to shoot this spacecraft down before impact. It might exist, perhaps a directed-energy weapon type of system; if not it would need to almost be another spacecraft with additional weaponry to compete one might think.

I don’t think people who are responsible and capable of handling such technology should have to wait decades, or even hundreds or thousands of years for governments to give the green light on using this technology. I do understand the reason for suppressing it, as it is arguably one of the most powerful tools and opportunities for abuse and could put our entire existence at risk under certain circumstances. However, the technology is already here, and governments of all types have levels of the technology, some like the U.S. clearly have a lead, but that might change in the near future. So, the risk already exists, but making it more accessible only increases the risk many times over.

Part of my logic behind allowing this technology to be accessible by civilians with the greatest of regulation is that if your government prevents you from leaving your country, you are a prisoner, again referencing North Korea, but this is happening in other countries as well, like Myanmar. Our home is Earth, but if we feel compelled to leave our home, I believe we should be able to do so as long as those venturing out into space have the greatest respect for other life and astropolitics. However, if our freedoms to create the technology to leave our home planet are suppressed, then we are still prisoners of our government, and that is what I have a problem with. I think governments should over a reasonable amount of time have general disclosure on the extraterrestrial situation and the technology. I think certain types of technology should be regulated for use, but other types banned for being too powerful. I think we need to lay down the law for what we can and cannot do, whether it involves our planet or being out in space, as there is clearly a responsibility needed on a level we still are yet to understand. There would need to be training and testing far beyond what we have with pilots training to operate/navigate space, those who are approved will be some of the most capable and disciplined individuals. We cannot have the sloppy situation we have currently as seen with those who drive motor vehicles flying spacecraft. Imagine how disastrous that would be; one might not be inebriated and still make a mistake that takes out an entire neighborhood by accident.

While this is currently a legitimate national security issue and will likely be so indefinitely going forward, I think the USF should do what it can to prepare for the time it can legally pursue the building of spacecraft, and or do so without fear of the consequences. If the time comes that we are ready to move forward, we can do so very cautiously and perhaps face limited consequences from government suppression such as in a time of total economic collapse. I also think the federal governments of the world need to be more realistic about what it will take to properly explore the universe and to create other societies outside of Earth. While I’m happy and excited about what companies like SpaceX are doing, I think limiting our survival to Mars and nearby space is simply not enough reassurance that our species will survive in the future. However, it is a natural progression, and a step in the right direction. SpaceX aims to build 1000 Starships for the Moon and Mars missions, as well as for other missions to nearby moons and planets in our solar system. Multiple corporations are building many of what is considered today as advanced rockets but in all reality is still antiquated technology when compared to spaceships that can leave our solar system and likely our galaxy. Our global society could have quite literally just one or two spaceships, that if made available to use by our civilian population, could simply shuttle back and forth multiple times a day between arguably any two destinations in our universe. That for me is an exciting thought that opens many possibilities.